Today any sort of thing can be called art and the contest seems to be just to get there first. The notion of permanence started going away when the abstract expressionists not only expressed contempt for traditional pictorial expression, but held little regard for traditional standards of craft and produced artwork destined to self-destruct due to material degradation in short decades. Since then any standard still standing has become the target, and a posse of the avant-garde has roamed the backstreets and surrounding fields to annihilate anyone’s priggish reservation about anything.
So now I hear installation is all the rage -- the sodded gallery; the advertising festooned, found refuge, pile; the petulant puzzle complaint about something very large and far away. Not only do I find these exercises sorta uninteresting, I don’t understand the commerce side. Who pays the artists, how does the gallery pay rent, and what does anyone get to take home? If it’s institutionally supported I question. I’m not closed-minded, but if everything is art, nothing is -- look it up.
It started with the flat blank surface that’s been the same for every artist who ever stretched canvas or gessoed a wooden panel, or confronted a smooth wall in a cave. In a long human history it’s become a magical place. The artist can find the newly prepared canvas intimidating, since once they’ve achieved even basic proficiency they begin to realize anything is in there at the beginning. Every masterpiece ever produced arose from that same white surface, and something even better is possible until the first mark is made. It shouldn’t be thought about too much.
No comments:
Post a Comment